<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chocolate Cubed &#187; google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chocolatecubed.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chocolatecubed.com</link>
	<description>Pastry recipes and baking tips from a group of trained pastry professionals.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:25:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Innovation Creates Jobs</title>
		<link>http://chocolatecubed.com/2009/original/innovation-creates-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://chocolatecubed.com/2009/original/innovation-creates-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Salvit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Original]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nytimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chocolatecubed.com/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning&#8217;s NYTimes business section had an article by Janet Rae-Dupree about the people and companies trying to get tax credits for innovation, because innovation creates jobs.  I wholeheartedly agree and want to mention a couple of examples.  Yahoo!, Google, Intel, Apple and Pfizer are just a few of the many examples of companies that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning&#8217;s NYTimes business section had an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/business/04unboxed.html?partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink">article by Janet Rae-Dupree </a>about the people and companies trying to get tax credits for innovation, because innovation creates jobs.  I wholeheartedly agree and want to mention a couple of examples.  Yahoo!, Google, Intel, Apple and Pfizer are just a few of the many examples of companies that created hundreds of thousands of jobs by innovating.  Google&#8217;s success generated almost 20,000 jobs according to <a href="http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_people_work_for_google">WikiHow</a> and that is not including all the peripheral Google-related jobs.  The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_marketing">SEM</a> business took a whole new twist when Google launched adwords and its auction model.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_optimization">SEO</a> is now a full-time job for many people and that is because search engines now drive businesses.  </p>
<p>Joseph Stiglitz was quoted in the article as saying all our bailouts are focusing on the past, not the future.  Will throwing money at corporations for innovation work?  or should the government be investing in small businesses?  I am not sure either will work effectively.  This is a little farfetched, but what about making all college graduates publish at least 1 academic paper before graduating?  This would show them the power of creating new ideas and the validity of peer review.  I am not sure it would create jobs, but it would certainly make our society one of thinkers and creators, two ingredients for innovation.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save">Share/Save</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chocolatecubed.com/2009/original/innovation-creates-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Privacy Concern:  Verizon Wireless and Google&#8217;s Mobile Search Deal</title>
		<link>http://chocolatecubed.com/2008/original/privacy-concern-verizon-wireless-and-googles-mobile-search-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://chocolatecubed.com/2008/original/privacy-concern-verizon-wireless-and-googles-mobile-search-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 23:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Salvit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Original]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nytimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chocolatecubed.com/?p=59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the last few days, the NY Times and the WSJ have been writing about Verizon Wireless&#8217; talks with Google to have Google build a mobile search engine and operate all of Verizon&#8217;s mobile searches.  The talks started because Verizon couldn&#8217;t figure out how to create a single way to search from their phones.  In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last few days, the NY Times and the WSJ have been writing about Verizon Wireless&#8217; talks with Google to have Google build a mobile search engine and operate all of Verizon&#8217;s mobile searches.  The talks started because Verizon couldn&#8217;t figure out how to create a single way to search from their phones.  In other words,  most Verizon phones make the customer use different search methods for each thing they are looking for.  So, if you want to search for a ring tone, you have one tool.  If you want to search for a game, there is another.  If you want an app, there is another.    Here comes Google to the rescue!  <span id="more-59"></span></p>
<p>Yesterday&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/23/technology/23google.html?ex=1377230400&amp;en=f3bda8dc381889f2&amp;ei=5124&amp;partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink">NY Times article</a> wrote about the talks and mentioned that the biggest thing holding things up are the privacy concerns that Verizon has.  The authors mentioned that Verizon hasn&#8217;t decided how much data about their customers they want to give over to Google.  I am happy Verizon is thinking about my privacy, but I am still concerned.  What data does Google want?  What kind of data is Verizon thinking about giving over?  Is it only about searches?  Does it include my subscriber status?   </p>
<p>I am going to hope that Verizon is only thinking about giving over information related to searches, because even the thought of more than that scares me.  More than search related data includes: how much I pay a month in usage charges, how long I use the phone for a day, how much money I spend in transactions over my phone, how long I have been a customer, if my GPS is on then where I travel, what my local hangouts are and anything else they know about me.  </p>
<p>In a comment to my post about where <a href="http://chocolatecubed.com/?p=30">privacy and marketers meet</a>, Roman said that I shouldn&#8217;t fear marketers because the data they have or want is relatively harmless.  I agree, I do not fear marketers.  I fear ad providers and ad networks because their networks and ad space is worthless if they cannot serve ads that will attract the right customer&#8217;s attention.  In order to optimize their ad server technology, they would love to know customer demographics, buying power and search and click patterns.  </p>
<p>If the deal goes through will Verizon allow their customers to opt-out of all the data sharing it is doing with Google?  I am sure not, because Google wants to know where you are when you search. They want to be able to serve you ads for a store right in front of you, or a restaurant down the block or reenforce a banner that is on the side of a building across from you.  Not only will they have the ability to serve local ads to you, they will also be able to interpret the meaning of your searches based on proximity.  For example, a search for the word &#8220;Prada&#8221; will be more valuable if you are on Fifth avenue in New York City than if you are in the Fort Lauderdale airport.  </p>
<p>At the end of the day, I hope we figure out how to curb all this data sharing and tracking across different media and that Verizon Wireless acts responsibly.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save">Share/Save</a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chocolatecubed.com/2008/original/privacy-concern-verizon-wireless-and-googles-mobile-search-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
